Monbiot just published his take on the outcome of the Copenhagen Summit, comparing this and future climate negotiations to the orchestra on the Titanic. As the reason for failure of the summit, he singles out the non-inclusive negotiation approach of the biggest emitters (notably China and the US) used to satisfy their domestic goals and audiences.
One hundred and two poor nations called for the maximum global temperature rise to be limited not to two degrees but to 1.5. The chief negotiator for the G77 bloc complained that Africa was being asked “to sign a suicide pact, an incineration pact, in order to maintain the economic dominance of a few countries”.
His conclusion? What happens now
… depends on the other non-player at Copenhagen: you. For the past few years good, liberal, compassionate people […] have shaken their heads and tutted and wondered why someone doesn’t do something. Yet the number taking action has been pathetic. Demonstrations which should have brought millions onto the streets have struggled to mobilise a few thousand. As a result the political cost of the failure at Copenhagen is zero.
Is this music not to your taste sir, or madam? Perhaps you would like our little orchestra to play something louder, to drown out that horrible grinding noise.
It is up to us to take matters into or hands and start reducing our impact on our planet.
Update: a very interesting take from the closed debate on China‘s role.
cross-published on Suficiente
It is always the single human being who makes the change possible. There will be two, four, eight, sixteen …… and oops, there you have a TRIBE:-)
And a TRIBE will make the change happen: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6vpBDFoMqc
Danke Ralf. I had not seen this interview yet. Happy holidays!